主页 > 国内 >

秦时明月

动态清晰度翻倍！AOC发布全球首款5K G-SYNC Pulsar显示器_我的网站

火影忍者

一 | 8月26日消息，AOC旗下游戏显示品牌AGON（爱攻）在Gamescom 2026（科隆游戏展）上推出AGP327KG电竞显示器，为全球首款搭载5K面板的G-SYNC Pulsar机型。

二 | New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.

The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.

"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.

While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."

The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.

The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.

The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.

The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.

The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.

A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.

The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.

The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.

UNI SM ING。这款显示器采用31.5英寸面板，原生分辨率5120×2880（5K），原生刷新率144Hz。核心卖点是NVIDIA G-SYNC Pulsar技术，通过变频背光脉冲将有效动态清晰度成倍提升，增强运动画面可见度，同时改善画面保真度、追踪能力和目标捕捉效率。 AOC用高速摄像机拍摄了对比视频，在同一台G-SYNC显示器、相同设置下运行《反恐精英：全球攻势》，开启与关闭Pulsar的拖影差异明显。该技术也获得媒体好评，PCWorld评价其让游戏就此告别画面模糊，PC Gamer认为动态场景下的清晰度差异毋庸置疑，硬件评测频道Battle(non)sense则提到低帧率下Pulsar表现尤为突出。